Skip to main content
Worker Rights

Why Worker Rights Keep Failing in Supply Chains—and What Actually Works

Voluntary audits haven't stopped modern slavery. If we're serious about worker rights, brands need to pay for living wages and fair prices—and stop pretending checklists are enough.

Fifty million. That's how many people were living in modern slavery on any given day in 2021, according to the ILO, Walk Free, and IOM. For those of us who've spent years in ethical sourcing, that number isn't a statistic—it's a gut punch. We've rolled out code of conducts, hired auditors, slapped on certifications. And yet, the same patterns of exploitation persist. It's like we're mopping the floor while the sink overflows.

The hard truth is that most supply chains still depend on invisible labor. Our current toolkit isn't working. We need to stop treating worker rights as a box to tick and start seeing them as a fundamental flaw in how global trade is built. That means moving from voluntary audits to mandatory, cost-bearing due diligence—and yes, that costs money.

The Audit Mirage

Audits are the backbone of ethical sourcing, but they're not the safety net we pretend they are. A 2021 review in Nature Food looked at sustainability standards and found they sometimes improve production processes, but the economic benefits for farmers are often modest. In other words, an audit might catch a child labor violation here or a safety hazard there, but it doesn't touch the root cause: poverty. When farmers can't earn a living income, they send their kids to work. No audit changes that math.

Take cocoa. An estimated 1.5 million children aged 5 to 17 are working on cocoa farms in Côte d'Ivoire and Ghana alone. That's not because farmers are cruel—it's because they're desperate. Fairtrade audits those farms and pays a premium. In 2023, Fairtrade cocoa producers earned EUR 57 million in premiums. But even that isn't enough. The average income of Ivorian Fairtrade cocoa farmers went up 85% over four years, yet they still don't earn a living income.

Audits are necessary but not sufficient. They point to problems, but they don't fix them. And too often, they're gamed. Factories know when auditors are coming. Workers get coached on what to say. The system is designed to verify, not to change.

Why Paying More Is the Only Way

Here's the thing: ethical sourcing has to shift from 'do no harm' to 'do good,' and that requires spending more. Consumers are ready. 83% of global consumers say they'll pay more for ethically sourced products. And the market rewards it: products with ESG-related claims grew 28% cumulatively over five years vs. 20% for those without. So why aren't we investing more in the people at the bottom?

The Fairtrade model shows what works. It's the only major global sustainability scheme that is 50% governed by producers. That governance structure ensures that premiums—over EUR 211 million in 2023 alone—go to worker-elected committees that decide how to spend them on health, education, or infrastructure. It's not just about money; it's about power. When workers have a say, they prioritize long-term solutions.

But Fairtrade covers only a sliver of global agriculture. Certified cropland covers just 1.1% of global cropland. We can't audit our way to scale. We need to embed worker rights into the cost of doing business.

What About Regulation?

Some will argue that regulation is the answer, not voluntary premiums. And indeed, we're seeing a wave of laws: the EU's Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) entered into force in July 2024, and the UK's Modern Slavery Act requires transparency reports. The UFLPA in the US presumes goods from Xinjiang are made with forced labor. These are powerful tools.

But here's the problem: regulation is reactive and often toothless. The CSDDD only applies to companies with 5,000+ employees and EUR 1.5 billion turnover. That excludes most of the supply chain. And even when laws exist, enforcement is spotty. The UK Modern Slavery Act has been criticized for low-quality statements and no penalties. Regulation sets a floor, but it doesn't create a living wage.

Moreover, regulation can backfire. The EU's Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) is well-intentioned, but it's causing smallholders to be cut out of supply chains because they can't provide geolocation data. That's not worker rights; that's exclusion. We need a complementary approach: regulation for accountability, but investment for empowerment.

Pay Up or Get Out

So here's what I'm saying, and it's not subtle: if you're sourcing from countries where worker rights are at risk, you must pay a premium that goes directly to workers, and you must do it without hiding behind audits.

  • Commit to paying living wage reference prices for key commodities, as Fairtrade has done for bananas in four countries.
  • Invest in producer organizations that are democratically governed by farmers and workers, like the 1,900 Fairtrade producer organizations.
  • Support remediation programs that address root causes, like Fairtrade's EUR 450,000 budget to help cocoa cooperatives generate alternative income so children don't have to work.

This isn't charity; it's supply chain security. When workers earn a living wage, they stay, they're more productive, and they're less likely to be exploited. And consumers are watching: 73% of Gen Z say they aim to buy from ethical companies. The cost of inaction is reputational, legal, and financial.

A quick tip: start with one commodity, one region, one premium. Don't try to fix everything at once. Just start.

Worker rights aren't a cost—they're an investment. The 50 million people in modern slavery are a stain on our global economy, and we have the power to change it, if we're willing to pay for it.

Sources

  • Fairtrade International - https://impact.fairtrade.net/about
  • McKinsey & NielsenIQ - https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/consumer-packaged-goods/our-insights/consumers-care-about-sustainability-and-back-it-up-with-their-wallets
  • Meemken et al. (Nature Food, 2021) - https://www.nature.com/articles/s43016-021-00360-3
  • Tayleur et al. (Conservation Letters, 2017) - https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12314
  • Walk Free Global Slavery Index - https://www.walkfree.org/global-slavery-index/findings/global-findings/
  • European Commission (CSDDD) - https://commission.europa.eu/business-economy-euro/doing-business-eu/corporate-sustainability-due-diligence_en

Share this article:

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!